General
A Few Thoughts on Esther
0My devotional time has taken me once again to Esther, a great book to study. If you know someone who struggles with gender roles and the bible this is a great one to point them to.
A misogynistic king divorces his queen because she will not come strut her stuff in front of his friends. To find another queen he lives with young virgins who have undergone a six month beautification process. For all intents and purposes this king is, as some would say: a pig. He does not allow his wife to be politically involved and does not even allow her to come and see him under the penalty of execution.
When the king threatens the family of the queen she steps up to the plate and breaks all the rules of her gender boundary and changes the face of a nation. She stops genocide. She breaks a glass ceiling or two, and she saves her family. She does the righteous thing before God.
The difference between Esther and modern feminism is respect and calling. Misogynistic systems are not biblical, but throwing a hand grenade down that rat hole is likely to cause a lot of harm. Esther went before the king knowing that she could be killed for doing so. Her motivation was not breaking a system but following a call from God to save her people. When she talked to the king she did not compete with him, she invited him. She invited him to eat with her. She invited his friends. She was not crude, she was not mean, she was humble.
Then she really changed things. She saved her people by the hand of God because she was humble, gracious, called, and given power by God. She was empowered to follow God’s will by the Spirit. If you are a feminist I would say it is fine to fight misogyny, but do it for the right reasons. Don’t hate for the sake of hating, and fight for real change. Don’t fight for a position at the top when the people at the bottom are still stuck in their ways. Instead pursue people with kindness and pray that God would transform their hearts to see both genders as God made them to be: created in his likeness.
Celebrity
0A constant struggle for preachers and teachers is answering to critics and recently it has become popular to label some preachers as celebrities. Preachers who sell a lot of books, have a lot of followers on Twitter and Facebook, and get a lot of views on YouTube are said to be celebrities. Oftentimes these preachers are critiqued. Critics say that they are making themselves larger than the message of Christ. They say that preachers should not seek popularity but rather should humble themselves. There are two perspectives that need to be emphasized when we are looking at preachers who are famous, either those who are famous and preach the Word and those who are famous and don’t.
Some would have you believe that Jesus was not famous. Jesus was very famous for a time. Giving away free food and miraculous healing will get you on the tongue of the local population. At the height of Jesus’ ministry he had people following him around getting close to him and touching him (Mark 5:24). He boated away from crowds (Mark 14:13). Jesus fed large crowds because they flocked to him. He fed a crowd of 5,000 men. Just the men numbered 5,000, not to mention their sisters, mothers, wives, and children. Was Jesus sinning by preaching in front of a lot of people? No, he was not.
Jesus’ ministry reflected the nature of God in two separate and equally glorious ways. The first was in reflecting the glory and love of God through healing and serving the needy. This is a great way to be attractional in ministry. Giving away free food and healing all the sick people who come into your church will attract people. Jesus also said heartwarming things like that we should love our neighbors and treat others as we should be treated. He was counter-cultural. He was against a powerful religious superstructure and was seen as a patriotic figurehead that would throw off Rome and unite the peasants of Israel and rid the land of the pagan Romans.
However Jesus’ ministry also revealed God’s justice and wrath. Jesus once met a young man and presented an ultimatum and watched him walk away (Luke 18:18). He also mourned the city of Jerusalem (Luke 13:31). Jesus did not shrink back from teaching hard words when the need arose and his ministry oftentimes suffered numbers wise. In the end Jesus’ ministry dwindled and he died alone. (more…)
The Plank, The Speck
0“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.
(Matthew 7:1-5 ESV)
Oftentimes this set of verses is interpreted using the very first line that Christ says: “Judge not, that you be not judged.” This is interpreted to mean: “If you judge others you will be condemned by God to hell, therefore judge not.” Of course this is not what the verses are saying, rather these verses are saying that with the standard that we use to judge we will be judged. If I, someone who is prone to lying, walk up to someone who has lied and say, “You are destined for hell and there is no hope for you” I would be judging their speck in spite of my plank which is hypocrisy. I think a better interpretation is that we should thank God for the specks in our neighbor’s eyes because they grant us the opportunity to check for planks in our own.
By nature I am not a good sin checker. When it comes to blind spots there are many in my life. So when meditating on this scripture I am generally pleased because it provides me with a way to see my own sin. Instead of looking at my neighbor as an evil person and saying, “I am so much better than them” I am called by Christ to say, “How am I like them? What do I need to repent of? How is my sin limiting my potential to preach the gospel to this person regarding their sin?” Seeing a speck in a neighbors eye provides introspection which, by the grace of God, leads to conviction which, by the blood of Christ, leads to repentance. Thank God for specks.
Do not be timid in judging sin. Do not be timid in judging your sin. Do not be timid in judging the sins of your neighbor. Do not condemn your neighbor but instead point them to the cross of Christ. Do not condemn yourself, but instead preach the gospel to yourself. This is the essence of what it means to see a speck, and why Christ calls us not to judge others as we would not ourselves.
St. Patrick
0Perhaps one of the most famous missionaries in the history of the Christian church is Saint Patrick. This is probably because he is the only missionary in America who is celebrated by a holiday. However the Patrick most Americans think of on March 17th every year is far different from the man who actually lived. One of the biggest misconceptions is about Patrick’s name; even though the holiday is called “Saint Patrick’s Day” Patrick was never canonized by the Roman Church and thus is not actually a saint. The second mistake that is often made is about Patrick’s heritage. While the holiday is celebrated with green clothes, leprechauns, and Irish beer the fact is that Patrick was not from Ireland, he was only a missionary there. While this can be a misconception about Patrick the fact that he is often thought of as Irish can speak to how well he was able to adapt to the Irish lifestyle and integrate himself into their culture.
Patrick was born in what is now England, a town called Bannavem Taburniae around the year 387. At the time Bannavem Taburniae was at the edge of the known world and was occupied by the Roman Empire. Born to a church deacon and the grandson of a priest Patrick described his childhood as rebellious and said he was “contemptible to many”. At the age of sixteen he was taken into captivity to serve as a slave in Ireland. As a slave Patrick was a shepherd. This meant he would spend many hours every day alone. During those times of silence Patrick’s thoughts would often turn to God. Patrick describes his conversion as that of “God opening my mind” after this he repented of his sins and would spend many of his waking hours in prayer. It was during those intense times of prayer that Patrick would say he felt the Spirit burning in him. After six years as a slave he felt called to flee his master and return to his home country. To escape Ireland Patrick was forced to join a crew of marauders. After several years of traveling with the marauders Patrick eventually made his way back to England and saw his family for the first time since his capture at the age of sixteen. Upon seeing him his parents pleaded with him to stay and never leave them again.
While Patrick had gone to great lengths to travel back to England it became immediately apparent to him that he was not going to stay. The very night that he returned to his parents he had a dream in which letters were sent to him from Ireland begging for his return so he could preach the gospel. At this time Ireland was a land of almost legendary paganism. Many clans were involved in depraved rituals, which made the Roman Church view them as beyond hope. Having lived there for at least six years Patrick would have most likely known firsthand about the religious situation and probably felt conflicted about a call to serve. Even though he received this call immediately after returning to England he waited many years before he would go. During his time in England several scholars believe that he received some sort of formal theological training, this would have been in addition to what he would have learned from his grandfather who was a priest. While he did receive an education Patrick made it clear that he did not have the same intense level of education that many priests had.
After at least twenty years of training and serving as a deacon in his church Patrick finally felt God pushing him to leave his life behind and go to Ireland as a missionary. During his time in England Patrick had come under scrutiny and was denounced by elders in his community because of a sin he had committed in his youth. While Patrick never revealed what the sin was he explained that he had confessed the sin to his friends and that it was something he had done in the ignorance of his youth when he didn’t trust in God. Eventually Patrick was able to silence most of his critics and continue on to a life of missionary service.
When Patrick arrived in Ireland he adopted a completely unique form of missions. During that time in history the Roman church was responsible for most of the missions work taking place. Their method would usually entail monks who would arrive in a foreign land and establish monasteries. From there monks could gain a foothold in the culture and preach the gospel. Patrick’s approach was entirely different as he normally operated as a wandering preacher. He would often travel to an unreached clan and seek an audience with the king, if the king was open to the gospel the rest of the clan would generally follow his lead. During his time with a clan Patrick would make it a habit of praying for their sick and trying to help meet some of their physical needs. As he did this he would gain credibility with the people he was with and have an opportunity to share the message of Jesus Christ. A famous example of his technique is his use of the three-leaf clover. For many years Ireland had viewed the clover as a special plant that was to be honored. Patrick recognized this and used the leaf’s unique shape to communicate how the Trinity of God worked. This use of local customs helped the Irish people relate to Patrick and understand what he was trying to communicate. If Patrick was ever able to convert a significant number of people in a clan he would then train local leaders so a church could be planted and a Christian community could continue after he left. Patrick recalls this practice in his autobiography in which he says that he never asked for any money or other compensation when he ordained new priests. This meant that Patrick, like the apostle Paul, did all he could to communicate that the gift of salvation is free.
Because Patrick’s style was so different from the Roman Catholic church there were many who saw the Celtic Christians as outside the church. The Celtic church had various different customs including what week Easter was celebrated. Their churches were often simple structures as opposed to the more elaborate structures built in the rest of Europe. Because of these differences there were many in the Catholic church who looked down upon the Celts and refused to help them.
Many times during his ministry in Ireland Patrick was faced with trials of different kinds. Because Ireland was such a barbaric place there were many clan kings who sought to harm because of the message he preached. Many times he was imprisoned, robbed, and threatened with death. Yet his passion and love for the Irish people was so strong that he stayed until the end of his life to be a missionary. This dedication paints a vivid picture of the holistic philosophy Patrick had towards his ministry. For Patrick reaching the barbarians wasn’t just something he planned on doing for a period of his life, but rather it was the purpose of his life from beginning to end.
Patrick’s impact on Ireland is certainly hard to fully understand. Because of its location and the fact that it is an island Ireland had remained almost entirely unreached with the Gospel before Patrick’s arrival. This meant that Ireland had a very unique culture compared to most of the countries closer to Rome, which at that time was the center of political, religious, and societal influence. Because he was so far away from Rome and was never officially commissioned as a missionary to Ireland Patrick often focused his teaching more on theology and biblical doctrine as opposed to tradition. This gave the Celtic churches an entirely different culture from Catholic churches in England and further east. Throughout the course of his life Patrick was able to baptize thousands of believers and plant hundreds of churches. The impact of these churches is quite easy to see even today. Celtic crosses are still used in many places today in Ireland and even countries such as Scotland and England. These crosses are much different from Roman Crucifixes and can trace their origins back to the churches planted by Patrick. Also in areas such as art and music Ireland was affected as they were exposed to the gospel. There are many different songs and poems written by Irish Christians who were influenced by Patrick’s teaching. Some of these songs may still be sung today including a well-known hymn “Be Thou My Vision”. Perhaps one of the greatest areas of influence Patrick had was the realm of intellectual pursuits. Before being exposed to the Gospel Ireland was a very dark place that fell behind the rest of the world in areas like education and intellectual progress. However after churches became more influential there was a greater drive for progress. Ireland would become known as “An Island of saints and scholars” Thomas Cahill in his book “How the Irish Saved Civilization” argues that because of this change in Irish culture there was an effort to preserve written works from Europe, including Greek and Roman classical works. The fall of the Roman empire was a chaotic time in which much knowledge would be lost, and Europe would be thrust into a dark age. However with the help of Irish libraries the western world was eventually able to rediscover it’s roots.
There are many lessons we can take from Patrick’s life and techniques. But perhaps the two most important are these: a passion for those we seek to serve and an emphasis on understanding the cultures we are trying to evangelize to. With a burning love for God and these two philosophies Patrick was able to change Ireland and shine the light of the Gospel into a dark land.
1 Corinthians In the Church
0This is taken from theresurgence.com article titled “Love Your (Theological) Enemies).”
In recent years my teaching and writing have taken me back repeatedly to 1 Corinthians 13, which takes a sober look at the impossibly high biblical standard for love.
The love in this passage is applicable to marriage, but Paul is also directly addressing the theological disagreements in the church. The Corinthians were plagued with controversies about worship, social class, and spiritual gifts. All of the things that divided them had theological entailments and implications. And all of their disagreements threatened to expose their loveless hearts.
So the Apostle Paul told them everything that love is—and everything that love isn’t. It is patient and kind. It isn’t rude or irritable. And so forth. 1 Corinthians 13 is a complete portrait of love for Christians caught up in controversy.
Biblical Abstinence
0During my senior year in high school I moderated two discussions on human sexuality. I was asked to do this by my life sciences teacher, one who I greatly respected. She was not, as far as I knew, a believer, but we had similar views on human sexuality to two different ends. I believe in abstinence for biblical reasons, while she believes in them for scientific ones. She rightly says that abstinence is effective 100% of the time. However she also believed that contraceptives should be made available and their proper use should be taught if passions were to be exercised. Over the past few years I have considered what that meant.
You don’t have to be a Christian to believe in a biblical principle. There are plenty of unbelievers who believe that murder and stealing are wrong. It is where conventional wisdom of man and what the bible says align that we often have to ask ourselves why we believe something, because our view of that topic may be distorted by cultural influences. Consider the command in Ephesians 5 for wives to submit to their husbands. This command was culturally supported for many centuries, but the reason why was often muddled leading to trouble. In Ephesians 5 Paul calls us to reflect the love and submission of Christ by husbands loving their wives and wives submitting to their husbands, but Western Civilization adopted this principle as a way to be prejudiced against women. Men who leverage their power over their wives abusively do not follow the bible, because they do not see the biblical reason for their wives to submit. They just assume that it is because they are supposed to lord over them, not as a reflection of the humility of Christ.
Abstinence is a powerful part of the Christian culture. It is a part of our cultural ethos to dedicate ourselves to a life of refraining from sexual contact until marriage. This is a biblical idea which started with the first man and woman. In Genesis 2:22-25 there is a marriage ceremony between Adam and his wife Eve. It is officiated by God, and afterwards in reflection the Holy Spirit quickened the hand of the writer of Genesis to write verse 24 which says, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife and they shall become one flesh.” Here we have a basic description of the standard of sexuality that the bible calls us to. We are to leave our parents, cling to our spouses, and have sex. All of this is after entering into a covenant with God and this other person that they would be as our flesh, as described in verse 23.
Adam and Eve’s courtship was very quick, and there were no other women for Adam to engage with sexually up until that point. So what about the time between when we start having sexual feelings towards others and when we get married? Isn’t it wrong to suppress your sexual desires? Why do we have sexual desires I will answer this question using the example of Christ.
Jesus Christ has existed eternally. He is the Son, the 2nd person of the trinity. He is in every way God. He is God with the Spirit and Father. He is one with them, and they are one with him. In being God Jesus is omnipresent. This is to say that Jesus Christ is God, and he is everywhere all the time. God is everywhere all the time. (Jeremiah 23:22-23) (more…)
New From the Dispersion
0Hey guys,
So we have released an e-book! If you remember our Weeding series from last year then you will want to pick up this e-book. We have released all the articles combined together on the Kindle. This makes for a quick read and it is only a dollar on the Kindle store. The Kindle store is available in app form on the Ipod, Ipad, and desktop computers. All proceeds go back to the Dispersion, helping us run the website and expand into future projects.
Thank you for your support.
Peace in Christ,
Jack
Love and Church
0As I was reading through a blog by Grace to You Ministries internet minister I began to think about some of the conventions of ministry. Having been close to many different churches I can tell you that no two churches work the same. If you went into the strictest of ritualistic congregations you would see subtle differences in how they “do church” from the language spoken to the edition of the hymnals. Many religions have a strict ritualistic approach to worship, but what we find in the New Testament is a collaboration of different parts of what most of us would call church into what the church actually is. There is a pretty good list in 1 Corinthians 13. Paul speaks about speaking in tongues, prophesying, understanding, encouragement, and singing songs as a part of the practice of the church. Elsewhere Paul will speak about defending and contending for the gospel, but this is a pretty exhaustive list. Theologians like Martin Luther would add administering the sacraments, like communion or baptism, as a part of what the church does. However the back bone of the church, the center of the church, is love. Paul compares one of the greatest obligations of the church, to suffer for Christ, unworthy in comparison to love. “If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing.” 1 Corinthians 13:3
With love at the backbone of church things get complicated. Love is not formulaic. Love for Christ is a supernatural thing. It is beyond us to completely understand the love that Christ has for us, but it is that love that we are called to emulate. That is at the very core of church. This creates a host of problems in and of itself, but Paul in 1 Corinthians when Paul defines what love is. It is an incredible list of impossible standards, however these standards are vital. What Paul is saying in 1 Corinthians 13:4-13 is that things like patience, rejoicing in truth, and enduring all things are not on the same level as preaching truth, prophesying or speaking in tongues. He is saying that they are much more important.
There will probably be many hours spent in 2012 with pastors wondering how they should “do church” and most of them will approach it like they approach a machine. They will try to work out inefficiencies or design systems that make the whole thing require less energy to run. However God puts systems, structures, and obligations aside for love. Love is the greatest thing to have at a church service. Pastors who worry about the effectiveness of their preaching should pray for Christ’s love to be reflected in their sermons. Children’s workers should pray for Christ’s patience. Those who minister to those in hospitals should pray for Christ’s endurance. All of these things are a reflection of his love.
The question for many churches, when it really boils down to it, is not about logistics, but about love. You will always run out of buildings, or have one that is breaking down. That’s just the way the world works. Do you have love? Do you have the love of Christ? Do you consider love before you consider the other parts of your service? At the core of the church should be the love of Christ. At the core of our understanding and service to the church should be the love of Christ.
Simplicity and Complexity
0Football players watch tape and preachers read the bible. The “game tape” of a teacher comes from studying great theological resources and studying the glory of God in the bible. Perhaps the hardest thing about Christianity is that God has called Christians to preach and teach to each other. Preachers and teachers are called to teach others who are called to teach others who are called to teach others. God calls some to be over tens, and some over tens of thousands. Wherever you are called you are called to preach and teach well. This puts an incredible amount of pressure on teachers to know and study the word so that when they teach they are not allowing bad teaching to trickle down.
We live in a culture of over-production. Our texts are short, our tweets are short, and our attention spans are short. Teachers of Christianity may sometime react to this wave of inattentiveness by modifying the message of Christianity into something much simpler than it is. The thinking is that we should mold the message of Christ into something that is easy to be heard by the person we are talking to. We develop messages that speak to parishioners but do not preach the harder things of the faith. (more…)
When We Find We Don’t Agree
0What kind of books to do you look at when you go to the bookstore or are surfing the web? Are they by the same author or come from the same publisher? Do they reflect the same theological perspective? A great book, that is full of great theological understanding, is a great resource to have. However what happens when a book isn’t as full of good theology or doesn’t line up with all of our views? Reading a book that is bad can be very beneficial for seeking great understanding and perspective on what God is calling us to as Christians. Below is a list of ideas on why and how to read a bad book.
Famous Authors
While a lot of people decry the end of Christendom, there is a powerful Christian culture that still exists. Rick Warren’s The Purpose Driven Life is the second best selling book in history, only to be outdone by the Bible. Books by men like Joel Osteen, Rob Bell, and Bill Hybels have sold very well through mostly Christian veins. Rob Bell’s books ask a lot of questions about classic Christianity and his ideas are very prevelant. So what if a brother or sister in Christ, who is not necessarily as solid in the word as you are, asks about Rob Bell’s ideas? Would you be able to respond following the scripture? Reading books that are by authors that we are not used to reading can help us respond to their ideas and contend and defend the gospel from bad teaching. (more…)
